MODULE 09 · Skill training · 85 MINUTES
Community needs, opportunities, and partnership research
Learn the principle. Practice the work. Preserve what you learn.

Your learning goals
- Distinguish documented needs from assumptions.
- Assess a potential partner using public evidence.
- Prepare a useful collaboration research packet.
Preparation
Describe the need with context
A needs statement explains who experiences a problem or opportunity, in what setting, and why the issue matters to the mission. Use available program records, credible public information, and authorized feedback to describe the context. Separate a documented need from a proposed interpretation. Avoid treating a single account as representative of an entire community. Record whose perspective is present and whose is missing. The initial output may be a research question rather than a confirmed need. A strong needs assessment also identifies existing strengths and resources: community networks, educational programs, accessible spaces, participant skills, and activities already working well.
Research fit before proposing contact
Potential partners can include educational organizations, community groups, service programs, and other mission-aligned institutions. Use current official public sources to identify mission, audience, activities, location or delivery mode, and a published contact route. Record the date and source for each fact. Assess fit through shared purpose, participant benefit, complementary capabilities, practical feasibility, accessibility, and any unresolved conditions. A public contact listing supports a possible route; it does not establish a relationship or consent to a specific collaboration. Prepare an information-exchange brief with a concise purpose, relevant evidence, potential contribution, and focused questions. Actual external communication follows the assigned authorization and sender workflow.
Translate research into a bounded opportunity
Create an opportunity table that allows comparison without false precision. Use clearly defined qualitative categories such as strong documented fit, partial fit, or insufficient information, and explain each judgment. Include practical considerations such as time zone, participant access, preparation effort, and available formats when supported by sources. Identify the smallest next information exchange that could resolve feasibility. Keep proposed benefits distinct from commitments and funding. A useful partnership packet makes it easy to answer whether the opportunity merits further exploration. Record what you learned and update the program plan when the evidence changes.
Worked example
Worked example: community opportunity comparison
Fictional candidates: Cedar Community Learning offers adult education online; Harbor Youth Circle serves minors in person; Lantern Volunteer Network coordinates adult service projects. For an adult online Q45 reflection pilot, Cedar has a direct audience and delivery fit, Lantern has a possible application pathway, and Harbor requires a different audience and safeguarding design. The intern records these as synthetic comparisons and proposes questions about participant needs, accessibility, and resource sharing. None is listed as an actual Q45 partner.
Your practical assignment
Prepare a community opportunity packet
- Write a 250-word needs statement with evidence and assumptions separated.
- Research three public organizations or use three explicitly fictional organizations.
- Compare mission, audience, delivery model, potential contribution, constraints, and unanswered questions.
- Draft a 150-word information-exchange message as a practice artifact.
- Recommend one next research step and explain the basis.
Evidence to prepare
- A needs statement.
- A three-organization fit table with source records.
- A practice message and evidence-based recommendation.
Assignment scoring guide
Use these criteria for self assessment and feedback. Each criterion contributes 25 points to the 100-point assignment rubric.
| Criterion | Points | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Needs reasoning | 25 | The statement distinguishes evidence, assumptions, and missing perspectives. |
| Research accuracy | 25 | Organization facts have current official sources or clear fictional labels. |
| Fit analysis | 25 | The comparison addresses mission, audience, feasibility, and participant benefit. |
| Actionability | 25 | The next step resolves a specific uncertainty without implying a commitment. |
Reflection
- Whose perspective is missing from your needs statement?
- What single answer would most change your partner recommendation?
Scoring and revision guidance
Evidence is absent or cannot be assessed.
Limited evidence; substantial guidance and revision are needed.
Partially demonstrated; a material element needs revision.
The essential requirement is met; minor corrections remain.
Complete, accurate, traceable, and usable evidence for the criterion.
Review the explanation for each missed question, revisit the relevant lesson, and retry. Revise practical work against the rubric and document the change.
Connected learning
Knowledge into practice
Answer all five questions, then view the explanations. Practice target: 80%. Revisit any lesson and try again.
Preserve your work
Sign in in a new tab for saved learning. Return to this tab to continue your work and save.
Each save creates a dated record. Keep a copy in your approved project workspace until the saved confirmation appears. Sensitive personal, clinical, donor, and participant records belong in their designated systems.